Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have launched a new website called sussex.com, which serves as a platform to communicate their own messages and initiatives separate from the royal family. The website focuses on their work and philanthropy, with sections dedicated to their Archewell foundation, their media endeavors, and their production company. However, the website notably omits any mention of their royal titles or their relationship with the royal family [Express].
The launch of the website has generated mixed reactions. Some critics argue that the couple is using their royal connections and titles to further their own commercial interests and profit from their brand. Others have accused them of trying to distance themselves from the royal family while still capitalizing on their status. Meanwhile, some supporters see the website as a way for Harry and Meghan to have more control over their own narrative and initiatives [Mirror] [The Sun].
On the website, Prince Harry highlights his passion for football and his involvement with the Invictus Games, but notably skips mentioning his connection to the American Football league, the NFL. There is speculation that this omission is deliberate in order to avoid any potential backlash or criticism for mixing business and royal duties [Express].
Additionally, the website's launch coincided with the anticipated airing of Prince Harry's documentary series about mental health, which features appearances from celebrities such as Oprah Winfrey and Lady Gaga. The timing of the website's launch and the documentary release has led some to question whether the couple is using their royal connections and status to gain more influence and relevance in the entertainment industry [Mirror].
Overall, the launch of sussex.com represents a significant move by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to establish their own independent brand and identity outside of the royal family. The website allows them to share their own messages, initiatives, and projects while maintaining control over their narrative. However, it has also sparked debate and criticism about their intentions and the potential exploitation of their royal titles and connections.
5.8
2
54
